Skip to main content
Glama

tool_estimate_points_value

Calculate cents-per-point for award bookings and compare against baseline valuations to determine if the deal is excellent, good, fair, or poor.

Instructions

Is this award booking a good deal? Calculate cents-per-point and compare against baseline valuations for 20+ programs (Chase UR, Amex MR, airline miles, hotel points). Returns verdict: excellent/good/fair/poor.

Args: points_cost: Points/miles required for the award booking cash_price: What the same booking costs in cash program: Points program (e.g., "chase_ur", "amex_mr", "united_mp", "hyatt_woh") currency: Cash price currency taxes_fees: Taxes/fees still paid in cash on the award (e.g., fuel surcharges)

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
points_costYes
cash_priceYes
programYes
currencyNoUSD
taxes_feesNo
Behavior3/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations provided; description only states function and output, not side effects or authorization requirements. Adequate but not explicit.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Concise, well-structured with clear question and args list. No unnecessary words.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Covers parameters and return value sufficiently. Could mention error handling but acceptable for this tool.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters5/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Despite 0% schema description coverage, the description fully explains each parameter's meaning in the Args section, adding value beyond the schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Clearly states it calculates cents-per-point for award bookings and returns a verdict, distinguishing it from similar tools like tool_calculate_points_or_cash and tool_compare_points_programs.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines3/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Implied usage for evaluating award deals but no explicit guidance on when to use versus siblings or when not to use.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/VirajMishra1/wander-agent'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server