list_objects

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations provided. Description is minimal but implies a read operation ('Henter'). Does not disclose additional behavioral traits like pagination behavior or limits beyond what is in the schema.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Very concise, one sentence with a list of modules. However, the list could be formatted as a bullet for better readability.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Lacks description of output format (e.g., returns an array of objects). With no output schema and no guidance on siblings, the agent is left guessing about return value and when to use this tool.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, so description adds no new parameter information beyond the schema. The tool description simply repeats the module list already present as an enum.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Description clearly states it retrieves objects from a Tracelink module and lists available modules, but does not differentiate from sibling list tools like list_orders or list_users, which have more specific purposes.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool vs alternatives. The description only lists modules without indicating that dedicated list tools exist for specific modules.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.