Skip to main content
Glama
Tracelink-Devops

Tracelink MCP Server

Official

Related Servers

Alternatives to Tracelink MCP Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      MCP server that integrates with Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central, enabling querying of customers, items, and sales orders through natural language commands in Claude Desktop.
      10
      -
    • F
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      MCP server for the ONE Framework ERP that enables Claude to explore data models, run queries, and understand business logic through autonomous access.
      10
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      MCP server giving Claude (and any MCP-compatible client) live access to SAP systems via ADT for reading, searching, editing, and activating ABAP objects.
      29 npm
      16
      MIT
    • -
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      Not graded
      maintenance
      MCP server that assists Claude Code with AVEVA MES development by providing structured domain knowledge and live query capabilities against a running MES instance's Web API V3.
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      MCP server for connecting Claude Desktop to FHIRfly healthcare reference data APIs, enabling lookup of drugs, providers, clinical codes, and more.
      126 npm
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      MCP server that enables AI platforms to search products, customers, and warehouses, and prepare and submit sales orders to a fixed ERP endpoint with per-session bearer authentication.
      -

    TDQS

    B3.2/5.0

    Scored across 22 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool targets a distinct entity and action (e.g., create_object vs. create_order, list_objects vs. list_orders). Descriptions clearly differentiate overlapping concepts like orders and suborders, leaving no ambiguity.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tool names follow a consistent verb_noun pattern with lowercase and underscores (e.g., add_journal, create_object, list_orders). No mixing of conventions or irregular naming.

    Tool Count5/5

    With 22 tools covering objects, orders, suborders, users, departments, journals, and relations, the count is well-scoped for an enterprise system. Each tool serves a necessary purpose without redundancy.

    Completeness2/5

    Significant gaps exist: no delete_object, no update/delete for suborders, and many entities (companies, users, departments) only have list/get tools with no create/update/delete. This will cause agent failures in full lifecycle operations.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues