get_order
Retrieve complete details of a specific order by providing its order ID.
Instructions
Henter en specifik ordre med alle detaljer
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| order_id | Yes | Ordre ID |
Retrieve complete details of a specific order by providing its order ID.
Henter en specifik ordre med alle detaljer
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| order_id | Yes | Ordre ID |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations are provided, and the description only states 'all details' without specifying behavior like error handling, prerequisites, or side effects, leaving the agent guessing.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
A single, clear sentence with no wasted words; appropriately concise for a simple get operation.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given low complexity (1 param, no output schema), the description is minimal but adequate; however, it doesn't explain return format or error conditions, which could help the agent.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema coverage is 100%, so baseline is 3. The description adds no extra meaning beyond the schema parameter 'order_id', which is already documented.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the action (Henter/get) and resource (specifik ordre/specific order) with scope (alle detaljer/all details), distinguishing it from sibling tools like list_orders or create_order.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No explicit when-to-use or alternatives are mentioned, but the purpose of retrieving a single order is implied; lacks exclusions or context for when not to use.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/Tracelink-Devops/mcp-server'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server