tosea_get_presentation_full_data

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description must disclose behavioral traits. It only states 'Fetch' implying read-only but does not mention authentication, rate limits, error handling, or whether the data is cached. Lacks detail beyond basic purpose.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

A single, front-loaded sentence efficiently conveys the tool's primary action and scope. No extraneous words or unnecessary details.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool's simplicity (one parameter, no output schema), the description is minimally viable. It indicates what data is returned ('full structured... outlines and slides') but lacks details on output format, error cases, or prerequisites. The absence of annotations is not compensated.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema has one parameter (presentation_id, uuid) with 0% schema description coverage. The description does not explain the parameter at all, failing to compensate for the schema gap. The parameter's purpose is somewhat inferable from its name, but the description adds no value.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description uses a specific verb 'Fetch' and resource 'full structured presentation data', clearly mentioning 'outlines and slides'. It distinguishes this tool from siblings like tosea_list_presentations (list only) and tosea_get_document_parse (different resource).

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool vs alternatives such as tosea_list_presentations for summaries or tosea_edit_slide_page for editing. The description does not provide any context for selection.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.