tosea_generate_outline

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description uses 'Queue' which implies asynchronous processing but does not explain expected behavior, success/failure indicators, or how to retrieve results. With no annotations, the description fails to disclose any behavioral traits beyond basic action.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, efficient sentence with no unnecessary words. However, it could be expanded to include key details without sacrificing conciseness.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The tool has three parameters, no annotations, and no output schema. The description is too sparse to fully guide an agent; it lacks information on return values, error states, or job lifecycle. More detail is needed for adequate completeness.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0%. The description does not clarify the meaning or allowed values of parameters like 'instruction' or 'render_provider'. The parameter names provide minimal clues, but the description adds no value beyond what is in the schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description 'Queue outline generation for an existing presentation' clearly states the verb (queue generation), resource (outline), and scope (existing presentation). It distinguishes from sibling tools like tosea_edit_outline_page which edit an existing outline.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives such as tosea_edit_outline_page or tosea_edit_slide_page. The description does not specify prerequisites or contextual triggers.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.