Skip to main content
Glama
TomMelt

HPC-MCP

by TomMelt
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python

Related Servers

Alternatives to HPC-MCP

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • lldb-mcp-server

      FYTJ
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      An MCP server that exposes LLDB debugging capabilities, enabling AI-assisted interactive debugging of C/C++ applications through 40 specialized tools.
      4
      MIT

    • mcp-dap

      ztripez
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A Model Context Protocol server that bridges MCP and the Debug Adapter Protocol, enabling AI coding agents to launch and control debug sessions, set breakpoints, step through code, and inspect variables.
      17
      MIT

    • jlab-mcp

      kdkyum
      F
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      An MCP server that enables LLMs to execute Python code on GPU-accelerated compute nodes within SLURM-managed HPC environments. It bridges local clients to remote clusters by launching JupyterLab sessions via SLURM jobs to facilitate high-performance notebook-based computation.
      7
      -

    • VSCode Debug MCP

      PeakBI
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      An MCP server and VS Code extension that enables AI clients to interactively debug code using breakpoints, execution control, and state inspection. It is language-agnostic and works with any debugger that supports VS Code's launch.json configurations.
      -

    • gdb_mcp

      airfloats
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      An MCP server that enables AI assistants to control GDB debugging sessions, including breakpoint management, thread analysis, and variable inspection, using the GDB/MI protocol.
      22
      1
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    B3/5.0

    Scored across 1 tool

    Disambiguation5/5

    With only one tool, there is no possibility of ambiguity or overlap between tools, as there are no other tools to compare it to. The tool's purpose is clearly defined and distinct by default.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    Since there is only one tool, naming consistency is inherently perfect—there are no other tools to create inconsistency or mixed conventions. The tool name follows a clear verb_noun pattern.

    Tool Count2/5

    A single tool is too few for a server named 'HPC-MCP', which suggests a High-Performance Computing domain that typically involves complex workflows like job submission, monitoring, and resource management. This minimal toolset severely limits functionality.

    Completeness1/5

    The tool surface is severely incomplete for an HPC domain; it only provides a debug function, missing essential operations such as job submission, status checking, file management, and resource allocation, which are core to HPC workflows.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources