sec_userDbPermissions

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

While the main description suggests a read operation, the persist parameter reveals a side effect (materializing a volatile table). Without annotations, this is partially disclosed but not highlighted upfront, and other behaviors (e.g., permissions needed) are omitted.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is concise, with a clear main line and two parameter lines. Every sentence is necessary and front-loaded without extraneous text.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

There is no output schema, and the description fails to specify the return format for the default case (persist=false). For persist=true, it mentions returning a table name, but overall completeness is lacking for a full understanding.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, and the parameter descriptions in the description are identical to those in the schema. No additional meaning is added beyond the schema, so a baseline of 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states 'Get permissions for a user across all databases,' providing a specific verb and resource. The tool name and context distinguish it from siblings like sec_rolePermissions and sec_userRoles.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives, nor are prerequisites or exclusions mentioned. The description lacks context about required privileges or tool selection criteria.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.