plot_radar_chart

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations declare readOnlyHint and idempotentHint, indicating safe read-only behavior. The description adds that it returns a dict, but multiple contradictions (radar vs line/donut plot references) undermine trust. No details on what the dict contains.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Moderately sized but contains redundant parameter list that duplicates schema. However, it is structured with clear sections. Could be more concise by removing repeated parameter details.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given low complexity and no output schema, the description is incomplete. It does not explain what 'labels' and 'columns' truly expect (e.g., column names or values), nor provide examples. Contradictions further reduce completeness.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, but the descriptions are poor and inconsistent: 'labels' is said to be for line plot, 'table_name' for donut plot. The description adds vague relation between labels and columns but lacks precision.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states it generates a radar plot for labels and columns, which gives a general idea. However, it is unclear how labels and columns relate, and the parameter descriptions have copy-paste errors (e.g., 'line plot', 'donut plot'), reducing clarity. No title available.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use radar chart vs sibling plot tools (line, pie, polar). The description does not mention any prerequisites or context for using this tool.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.