Skip to main content
Glama
Teradata

Teradata MCP Server

Official
by Teradata

Dba Databaseversion

dba_databaseVersion
Read-onlyIdempotent

Returns the Teradata database software version and release information to identify the running system version.

Instructions

Return the Teradata database software version and release information. Use when the user asks what version of Teradata is running on the system.

Arguments: persist - If True, materializes result as a volatile table and returns table name

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
persistNoIf True, materializes result as a volatile table and returns table name

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Changed2 schema fields changedv0.2.1
    • addedInput schema / additionalProperties
      Added value: +false
    • addedInput schema / properties / persist
      Added value: +{
      +  "default": false,
      +  "description": "If True, materializes result as a volatile table and returns table name",
      +  "type": "boolean"
      +}
  2. Addedv1.0.0

TDQS

A4.1/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnlyHint and idempotentHint, covering the safety profile. The description adds meaningful behavioral context by disclosing that setting persist to True materializes results as a volatile table and returns the table name, which is not implied by the annotations alone.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is short, front-loaded with the purpose, and includes a clear usage trigger. The argument explanation slightly duplicates the schema, but this is minor and does not bloat the description.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a low-complexity tool with one optional parameter and strong annotations, the description covers the core behavior and usage context. It does not detail the exact return format beyond 'version and release information', but this is a minor gap given the simplicity of the tool.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100% for the single persist parameter, so the baseline is 3. The description repeats the same parameter text as the schema without adding new meaning or clarifications, so it neither improves nor harms parameter understanding.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states a specific action ('Return the Teradata database software version and release information') tied to a concrete resource, which clearly differentiates it from the many sibling dba_* tools. It also names the exact user intent that triggers it, leaving no ambiguity about what the tool does.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description explicitly states when to use it: when the user asks what version of Teradata is running. It doesn't mention alternatives or when not to use it, but among the sibling list there are no other version-focused tools, so the guidance is clear and sufficient.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.