UniProt MCP Server
Servidor MCP de UniProt
Un servidor de Protocolo de Contexto de Modelo (MCP) que proporciona acceso a la información de las proteínas de UniProt. Este servidor permite a los asistentes de IA obtener información sobre la función y la secuencia de las proteínas directamente de UniProt.
Características
Obtenga información sobre proteínas por número de acceso de UniProt
Recuperación por lotes de múltiples proteínas
Almacenamiento en caché para un mejor rendimiento (TTL de 24 horas)
Manejo y registro de errores
La información incluye:
Nombre de la proteína
Descripción de la función
Secuencia completa
Longitud de la secuencia
Organismo
Related MCP server: UniProt MCP Server
Inicio rápido
Asegúrese de tener instalado Python 3.10 o superior
Clonar este repositorio:
git clone https://github.com/TakumiY235/uniprot-mcp-server.git cd uniprot-mcp-serverInstalar dependencias:
# Using uv (recommended) uv pip install -r requirements.txt # Or using pip pip install -r requirements.txt
Configuración
Agregue a su archivo de configuración de Claude Desktop:
Ventanas:
%APPDATA%\Claude\claude_desktop_config.jsonmacOS:
~/Library/Application Support/Claude/claude_desktop_config.jsonLinux:
~/.config/Claude/claude_desktop_config.json
{
"mcpServers": {
"uniprot": {
"command": "uv",
"args": ["--directory", "path/to/uniprot-mcp-server", "run", "uniprot-mcp-server"]
}
}
}Ejemplos de uso
Después de configurar el servidor en Claude Desktop, puede hacer preguntas como:
Can you get the protein information for UniProt accession number P98160?Para consultas por lotes:
Can you get and compare the protein information for both P04637 and P02747?Referencia de API
Herramientas
get_protein_infoObtener información para una sola proteína
Parámetro obligatorio:
accession(número de acceso de UniProt)Ejemplo de respuesta:
{ "accession": "P12345", "protein_name": "Example protein", "function": ["Description of protein function"], "sequence": "MLTVX...", "length": 123, "organism": "Homo sapiens" }
get_batch_protein_infoObtenga información para múltiples proteínas
Parámetro obligatorio:
accessions(matriz de números de acceso de UniProt)Devuelve una matriz de objetos de información de proteínas.
Desarrollo
Configuración del entorno de desarrollo
Clonar el repositorio
Crear un entorno virtual:
python -m venv .venv source .venv/bin/activate # On Windows: .venv\Scripts\activateInstalar dependencias de desarrollo:
pip install -e ".[dev]"
Ejecución de pruebas
pytestEstilo de código
Este proyecto utiliza:
Negro para formato de código
isort para la clasificación de importaciones
flake8 para quitar pelusa
mypy para verificación de tipos
bandido para controles de seguridad
seguridad para comprobaciones de vulnerabilidad de dependencia
Ejecutar todas las comprobaciones:
black .
isort .
flake8 .
mypy .
bandit -r src/
safety checkDetalles técnicos
Construido con el SDK de Python de MCP
Utiliza httpx para solicitudes HTTP asíncronas
Implementa almacenamiento en caché con TTL de 24 horas utilizando un caché basado en OrderedDict
Maneja la limitación de velocidad y los reintentos
Proporciona mensajes de error detallados
Manejo de errores
El servidor gestiona varios escenarios de error:
Números de acceso no válidos (404 respuestas)
Problemas de conexión de API (errores de red)
Limitación de velocidad (429 respuestas)
Respuestas mal formadas (errores de análisis de JSON)
Gestión de caché (TTL y límites de tamaño)
Contribuyendo
¡Agradecemos tus contribuciones! No dudes en enviar una solicitud de incorporación de cambios. Así es como puedes contribuir:
Bifurcar el repositorio
Crea tu rama de funciones (
git checkout -b feature/amazing-feature)Confirme sus cambios (
git commit -m 'Add some amazing feature')Empujar a la rama (
git push origin feature/amazing-feature)Abrir una solicitud de extracción
Asegúrese de actualizar las pruebas según corresponda y respetar el estilo de codificación existente.
Licencia
Este proyecto está licenciado bajo la licencia MIT: consulte el archivo de LICENCIA para obtener más detalles.
Expresiones de gratitud
UniProt por proporcionar la API de datos de proteínas
Antrópico para la especificación del Protocolo de Contexto del Modelo
Colaboradores que ayudan a mejorar este proyecto
Available Tools
2 toolsget_batch_protein_infoB
Get protein information for multiple accession No.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| accessions | Yes | List of UniProt accession No. |
TDQS
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
With no annotations provided, the description carries full burden but lacks behavioral details. It doesn't disclose whether this is a read-only operation, potential rate limits, authentication needs, or what 'protein information' includes (e.g., format, fields). The description is minimal and adds little beyond the basic action.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is a single, efficient sentence with no wasted words, clearly front-loading the purpose. It is appropriately sized for a simple tool with one parameter.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given no annotations and no output schema, the description is incomplete. It doesn't explain what 'protein information' entails, potential errors, or behavioral traits, leaving significant gaps for a tool that presumably returns complex data.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema description coverage is 100%, with the parameter 'accessions' documented as 'List of UniProt accession No.' in the schema. The description adds no additional meaning beyond this, such as format examples, constraints, or usage tips, so it meets the baseline for high schema coverage.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the action ('Get protein information') and the resource ('multiple accession No.'), making the purpose understandable. It distinguishes from the sibling tool 'get_protein_info' by specifying 'multiple' vs. presumably single, though not explicitly naming the alternative.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
The description implies usage when multiple accession numbers are needed, but provides no explicit guidance on when to use this vs. the sibling tool 'get_protein_info' (e.g., for bulk vs. single queries). No exclusions or prerequisites are mentioned.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
get_protein_infoB
Get protein function and sequence information from UniProt using an accession No.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| accession | Yes | UniProt Accession No. (e.g., P12345) |
TDQS
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations are provided, so the description carries the full burden. It mentions the data source (UniProt) and type of information, but lacks details on behavioral traits like rate limits, error handling, authentication needs, or response format. This is a significant gap for a tool with no annotation coverage.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is a single, efficient sentence that front-loads the purpose without unnecessary words. Every part of the sentence contributes to understanding the tool's function.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given no annotations and no output schema, the description is incomplete. It does not explain what the return values look like (e.g., format of function and sequence information), error cases, or other contextual details needed for effective use.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
The schema description coverage is 100%, with the parameter 'accession' well-documented in the schema. The description adds minimal value by mentioning 'UniProt Accession No.' and providing an example, but does not elaborate beyond what the schema already specifies.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the action ('Get') and resource ('protein function and sequence information from UniProt'), specifying the data source and type of information retrieved. It distinguishes from the sibling tool 'get_batch_protein_info' by implying this is for single proteins, though not explicitly contrasting them.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
The description implies usage when you have a UniProt accession number and need protein details, but does not explicitly state when to use this versus the sibling batch tool or other alternatives. No exclusions or prerequisites are mentioned.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
Tool Schema Changelog
Recent tool additions, removals, and schema changes observed during successful MCP inspections.
2 tool updates
- First observed
get_batch_protein_info - First observed
get_protein_info
TDQS
Scored across 2 tools
The two tools have clearly distinct purposes: get_protein_info retrieves detailed function and sequence information for a single protein accession, while get_batch_protein_info handles multiple accessions in batch. There is no overlap or ambiguity in their functions.
Both tools follow a consistent verb_noun pattern with 'get_' prefix and snake_case naming. The naming clearly indicates the action (get) and target (protein_info), with batch differentiation for the multi-accession tool.
With only two tools, the server feels severely under-scoped for a UniProt domain. While the tools cover basic retrieval, there are obvious gaps for operations like searching, filtering, or accessing related data (e.g., taxonomy, structures), making the surface too thin for comprehensive protein information workflows.
The server is severely incomplete for UniProt functionality. It only provides protein information retrieval (single and batch), missing essential operations like search_by_keyword, get_taxonomy, get_structure, or update tracking. This will cause agent failures when trying to perform typical bioinformatics tasks beyond simple lookups.
Maintenance
Related MCP Connectors
Give AI assistants access to real-time data. Search the web, compare flights, find hotels, and more.
Provide AI assistants with real-time access to official SEC EDGAR filings and financial data. Enab…
Enable AI assistants to perform web searches using Perplexity's Sonar Pro.
Live data gateway for AI — 3,300+ tools across 750+ sources, with citations
Related MCP Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceAn MCP server that enables language models to fetch protein information from the UniProt database, including protein details, sequences, functions, and structures.MIT
- AlicenseBqualityDmaintenanceProvides seamless access to UniProtKB protein database, enabling queries for protein entries, sequences, Gene Ontology annotations, full-text search, and ID mapping across 200+ database types.52MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceProvides access to UniProt protein sequence and function knowledge base, enabling search and retrieval of protein entries, proteomes, taxonomy, and feature annotations.190 npmMIT
- FlicenseBqualityDmaintenanceProvides programmatic access to AlphaFold protein structure predictions and UniProt data, enabling users to retrieve protein structures, summaries, and annotations through natural language.3-