Skip to main content
Glama
Synlake-ai

Synlake MCP Server

Official
by Synlake-ai
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
TypeScript
Remote

Related Servers

Alternatives to Synlake MCP Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • Cloud Pilot MCP

      vitalemazo
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Provides AI agents with natural language control over AWS, Azure, GCP, and Alibaba Cloud infrastructure through dynamic API discovery and execution. Supports 51,900+ cloud operations and includes OpenTofu integration for complete infrastructure lifecycle management.
      3
      MIT

    • CloudCost MCP Server

      JadenRazo
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to parse multi-cloud infrastructure-as-code files, query real-time pricing from AWS, Azure, and GCP, and generate cost estimates and comparison reports.
      12 npm
      MIT

    • Provision Stack MCP

      TravisLinkey
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Cloud infrastructure provisioning via natural language. Enables deploying production-ready infrastructure on AWS, GCP, Azure, or Oracle with a single prompt.
      12
      7 npm
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A3.9/5.0

    Scored across 5 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose: cost estimation, provider listing, infrastructure query with code generation, usage checking, and pre-deployment validation. No overlap or ambiguity.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    All tools share the 'synlake_' prefix, but the second part mixes verbs (estimate, query, validate) and nouns (providers, usage). While readable and clear, a fully consistent verb pattern would be better.

    Tool Count5/5

    With 5 tools covering estimation, provider info, query, usage, and validation, the scope is well-scoped and each tool earns its place. Neither too few nor too many for the domain.

    Completeness4/5

    The set covers core workflows: cost estimation, provider discovery, full infrastructure query with code generation, usage monitoring, and pre-deployment validation. Missing a direct deployment execution tool is a minor gap, as the query tool provides ready-to-execute code but no deploy command.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources