Skip to main content
Glama
Synlake-ai

Synlake MCP Server

Official
by Synlake-ai

Related Servers

Alternatives to Synlake MCP Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Provides AI agents with natural language control over AWS, Azure, GCP, and Alibaba Cloud infrastructure through dynamic API discovery and execution. Supports 51,900+ cloud operations and includes OpenTofu integration for complete infrastructure lifecycle management.
      3
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to parse multi-cloud infrastructure-as-code files, query real-time pricing from AWS, Azure, and GCP, and generate cost estimates and comparison reports.
      111 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants and coding agents to query a normalized multi-cloud catalog for compute, database, serverless, and AI-model token pricing, estimate full-stack workload architecture costs, and look up data-center availability and compliance pointers directly within their workflows.
      4
      65 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to provision and manage cloud infrastructure and AI/ML workloads—such as GPUs, nodes, storage, networking, databases, Kubernetes, and training/inference resources—through natural language. It also provides a universal REST tool for authenticated access to the underlying cloud API.
      46
      31 npm
      Apache 2.0
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables LLM agents to connect to multi-cloud DevOps control planes for Terraform plan inspection, drift detection and remediation, cost estimation, incident triage, and cloud resource discovery across Azure, AWS, and GCP. It supports autonomous workflows for PR review, FinOps optimization, and self-healing operations through MCP tools.
      MIT

    TDQS

    A3.9/5.0

    Scored across 5 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose: cost estimation, provider listing, infrastructure query with code generation, usage checking, and pre-deployment validation. No overlap or ambiguity.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    All tools share the 'synlake_' prefix, but the second part mixes verbs (estimate, query, validate) and nouns (providers, usage). While readable and clear, a fully consistent verb pattern would be better.

    Tool Count5/5

    With 5 tools covering estimation, provider info, query, usage, and validation, the scope is well-scoped and each tool earns its place. Neither too few nor too many for the domain.

    Completeness4/5

    The set covers core workflows: cost estimation, provider discovery, full infrastructure query with code generation, usage monitoring, and pre-deployment validation. Missing a direct deployment execution tool is a minor gap, as the query tool provides ready-to-execute code but no deploy command.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues