Synlake MCP Server
OfficialServer Configuration
Describes the environment variables required to run the server.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| SYNLAKE_API_KEY | Yes | Your Synlake API key. | |
| SYNLAKE_API_URL | No | Override the remote endpoint URL (default is https://api.synlake.ai/api/mcp). |
Instructions
Guidance the server publishes about itself, which clients place ahead of the tool catalog so the model reads it before choosing anything.
This server publishes no instructions, or was last inspected before Glama recorded them.
Capabilities
Features and capabilities supported by this server
Protocol revision2025-11-25
| Capability | Details |
|---|---|
| tools | {
"listChanged": true
} |
Tools
Functions exposed to the LLM to take actions
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
| synlake_queryA | Describe what infrastructure you need (compute, storage, database, networking) and get the best option across AWS, GCP, and Azure with Terraform code and CLI commands ready to execute. |
| synlake_estimateB | Get quick cost estimates across AWS, GCP, and Azure for your infrastructure needs. Returns the cheapest option and savings percentage. |
| synlake_validateA | Validate a Terraform or CLI execution kit before deploying. Checks budget limits, security configuration, and returns warnings. |
| synlake_providersA | Get the list of supported cloud providers (AWS, GCP, Azure) with available services, regions, and last pricing update. |
| synlake_usageA | Check your current API usage, rate limits, total infrastructure deployed, and remaining budget. |
Prompts
Interactive templates invoked by user choice
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
No prompts | |
Resources
Contextual data attached and managed by the client
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
No resources | |
TDQS
Scored across 5 tools
Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose: cost estimation, provider listing, infrastructure query with code generation, usage checking, and pre-deployment validation. No overlap or ambiguity.
All tools share the 'synlake_' prefix, but the second part mixes verbs (estimate, query, validate) and nouns (providers, usage). While readable and clear, a fully consistent verb pattern would be better.
With 5 tools covering estimation, provider info, query, usage, and validation, the scope is well-scoped and each tool earns its place. Neither too few nor too many for the domain.
The set covers core workflows: cost estimation, provider discovery, full infrastructure query with code generation, usage monitoring, and pre-deployment validation. Missing a direct deployment execution tool is a minor gap, as the query tool provides ready-to-execute code but no deploy command.