Skip to main content
Glama
Sunwood-ai-labs

Command Executor MCP Server

by Sunwood-ai-labs
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
JavaScript

Related Servers

Alternatives to Command Executor MCP Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • cmd-line-mcp

      wwqdrh
      A
      license
      B
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      A secure Model Context Protocol server that allows AI assistants to execute terminal commands with controlled directory access and command permissions. It features a robust security architecture including whitelisting, session IDs, and categorized command levels to ensure safe system interaction.
      8
      MIT

    • stela-mcp

      Sachin-Bhat
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A Model Context Protocol server for secure local system operations, enabling shell command execution and file management via a standardized interface.
      14
      1
      Apache 2.0

    • Code Sandbox MCP Server

      philschmid
      A
      license
      B
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A secure Model Context Protocol server that allows AI assistants and LLM applications to safely execute Python and JavaScript code snippets in containerized environments.
      2
      204
      MIT

    • MCP Toolkit

      zxfgds
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A comprehensive Model Context Protocol server implementation that enables AI assistants to interact with file systems, databases, GitHub repositories, web resources, and system tools while maintaining security and control.
      42 npm
      2
      MIT

    • MCP Terminal

      sichang824
      A
      license
      C
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      A server that enables AI assistants to execute terminal commands and retrieve outputs via the Model Context Protocol (MCP).
      3
      26
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    B3.2/5.0

    Scored across 1 tool

    Disambiguation5/5

    With only one tool, there is no possibility of confusion between tools. The agent can only select 'execute_command', so disambiguation is perfect.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    The single tool is named 'execute_command', following a clear verb_noun pattern, which is consistent and intuitive.

    Tool Count3/5

    One tool is minimal for a command executor. While it covers the core functionality of executing pre-approved commands, it lacks supporting tools for listing or managing commands, making the set feel thin.

    Completeness2/5

    The tool surface is severely incomplete. It only provides execution but lacks tools to list available commands, check execution status, or retrieve results, which are essential for effective agent interaction.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessUnresponsive

    Resources