accelo_create_company

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description must carry the full behavioral burden. It discloses that this is a create operation and notes one parameter interaction ('standing' overridden by 'status_id'), but omits permissions, duplicate behavior, side effects, and return format for a mutation tool.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is front-loaded with the core action and then provides a compact, well-structured argument list. Given the absence of schema descriptions, every line in the Args block adds useful information without redundancy.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a 10-parameter create tool with no annotations, no output schema, and 0% schema description coverage, the description covers purpose and parameter semantics reasonably well. However, it lacks usage guidance, behavioral details, and any indication of what the call returns, leaving meaningful gaps.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

With schema description coverage at 0%, the description compensates by listing all 10 parameters with human-readable meanings. It marks 'name' as required and clarifies the override relationship between 'standing' and 'status_id', though it lacks expected formats or value domains for fields like 'status_id' and 'standing'.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states a specific verb and resource: 'Create a new company in Accelo.' This clearly distinguishes it from sibling tools such as accelo_get_company, accelo_list_companies, accelo_update_company, and accelo_delete_company.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description gives no explicit guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives, nor does it mention prerequisites such as permissions or duplicate handling. The create intent is implied by the verb, but no usage context is provided.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.