dawarich_select_visit_place

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description carries full responsibility for disclosing behavior, but it only says 'select' without indicating whether this is a mutation, whether it modifies a visit's place, how dry_run is handled, or any side effects. This is essentially no behavioral information.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single sentence with no filler words, making it extremely concise. However, it is under-specified; still, for what it contains, it is efficient and front-loaded with the core action.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The description is inadequate for a tool that likely performs a meaningful side-effect (selecting/assigning a place to a visit). It lacks any context about input semantics, the meaning of dry_run, or the behavior of the operation, leaving the agent to guess despite the presence of an output schema.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The schema has zero description coverage, and the tool description does not mention any of the three parameters (visit_id, place_id, dry_run). The description provides no meaning beyond the raw schema, so the agent gets no help in understanding what values to provide.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states a specific action ('Select one of Dawarich's possible places') and its object ('for a visit'), distinguishing it from sibling tools like create_place or create_visit. It is not a tautology, though 'select' could be more precise about what it does (e.g., assign or link).

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool vs alternatives. It does not mention prerequisites, such as needing an existing visit_id, or contrast with similar tools like dawarich_update_visit or dawarich_create_place.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.