dawarich_create_place

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description carries the full burden of behavioral disclosure. It only states that a place is created, without mentioning persistence details, required permissions, idempotency, or side effects. It does not contradict annotations (none provided), but it is far too minimal for a mutation tool.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is concise in word count, but it is under-specified for a tool with six parameters. It lacks essential details and is closer to under-specification than to effective conciseness. There is no front-loading of critical information because there is almost no information to front-load.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool's complexity (6 parameters, no annotations, and an output schema that is not detailed in the description), the description is grossly incomplete. It does not explain what a 'manual place' means, how it relates to visits or points, or what the output represents. It is inadequate for an agent to invoke the tool correctly.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0%, and the description does not compensate at all. It does not explain the meaning or purpose of any of the six parameters (e.g., name, latitude, longitude, note, dry_run, tag_ids), leaving the agent to infer everything from the parameter names alone. The description adds zero semantic value beyond the schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description 'Create a manual Dawarich place' uses a specific verb and resource, clearly indicating the action. It adds the modifier 'manual' which gives some context, but it does not distinguish this tool from siblings like dawarich_create_visit or dawarich_create_trip.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives such as dawarich_update_place or dawarich_create_visit. There is no mention of context, prerequisites, or exclusions.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.