dawarich_delete_place

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description discloses that the tool 'Defaults to dry-run,' which is a safety-relevant behavioral trait not visible in the schema. However, with no annotations, it fails to warn about the destructive nature when dry_run=false, potential irreversibility, or effects on associated places/visits. The dry-run note adds some value but leaves significant gaps.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is extremely concise, consisting of two short sentences with no wasted words. It front-loads the core action and adds a critical behavioral note in a compact form.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a destructive delete operation with a dry-run flag, the description is too terse. It doesn't explain how to actually execute the deletion (e.g., setting dry_run to false), what the output schema represents, or whether deleting a place cascades to related entities. The existing output schema does not mitigate the missing behavioral context.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0%, so the description must compensate. It mentions the dry_run default, but that information already exists in the schema's default value. It does not explain what dry_run does (e.g., preview vs. actual deletion) or provide any semantics for place_id beyond its name.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description 'Delete a Dawarich place' is a specific verb+resource statement that clearly identifies the tool's function. It distinguishes from sibling operations like create/update place and delete trip, and the dry-run mention adds a useful qualifier.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description gives no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives such as updating a place or deleting a trip. There are no exclusions, prerequisites, or contextual clues about appropriate usage scenarios.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.