coolify_stop_application
Stop a running application in Coolify by providing its UUID. This halts the application processes and frees resources.
Instructions
Stop an application
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| uuid | Yes | Application UUID |
Stop a running application in Coolify by providing its UUID. This halts the application processes and frees resources.
Stop an application
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| uuid | Yes | Application UUID |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations provided, so description carries full burden. It only states 'Stop an application' without disclosing behavioral traits such as whether shutdown is graceful or forceful, required permissions, or any side effects. Insufficient for an agent to understand implications.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Extremely concise at one sentence. No wasted words, but lacks additional context that would improve usability. Still, for a simple action it is appropriately sized.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
No output schema and minimal description. Lacks details about return values or state changes. An agent using this tool would need more context about what happens after stopping an application.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Input schema has 1 parameter with 100% description coverage ('Application UUID'). The tool description adds no additional meaning beyond the schema. Score set to baseline 3 per guidelines.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
Description is 'Stop an application', which clearly identifies the verb (stop) and resource (application). It distinguishes this tool from siblings like 'start_application', 'restart_application', and 'delete_application'.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool vs alternatives. Does not mention prerequisites, effects on running state, or scenarios where stop is appropriate. The description is purely a statement of the action.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/Ruashots/coolify-mcp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server