coolify_delete_private_key
Deletes a specified private key using its UUID, removing it from the Coolify infrastructure.
Instructions
Delete a private key
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| uuid | Yes | Private key UUID |
Deletes a specified private key using its UUID, removing it from the Coolify infrastructure.
Delete a private key
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| uuid | Yes | Private key UUID |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations are provided, and the description does not disclose any behavioral traits such as irreversibility, required permissions, or cascading effects. The description is insufficient for the agent to understand the tool's implications.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is extremely concise (one sentence). While not verbose, it lacks supplementary information that could aid understanding, making it merely adequate without earning a higher score.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given the simplicity of the tool (one parameter, no output schema), the description is minimal. However, it fails to provide behavioral context that annotations or extra details would supply, leaving gaps in completeness.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
The input schema has 100% coverage with the parameter 'uuid' described as 'Private key UUID'. The description does not add any additional meaning beyond the schema, meeting the baseline for high coverage.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description 'Delete a private key' clearly states the verb and resource, and it distinguishes from sibling tools like create, update, list, and get. It is straightforward and unambiguous.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives. The agent must infer from the name alone that it is for deleting private keys, with no context on prerequisites or typical scenarios.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/Ruashots/coolify-mcp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server