coolify_list_servers
List all servers managed by Coolify.
Instructions
List all servers
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
List all servers managed by Coolify.
List all servers
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
With no annotations, the description must convey behavior. It implies a safe read operation, but does not disclose details like response format, pagination, or any side effects. Minimal but adequate for a simple list.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Extremely concise (3 words), front-loaded with the core action and resource. No unnecessary information.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given no output schema and no annotations, the description is too minimal. It omits what the response contains, which is essential for the agent to utilize the result. Should mention return structure or data fields.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
No parameters exist, so schema coverage is 100%. The description adds no additional meaning beyond what the schema (empty) provides. Baseline score of 3 is appropriate.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description 'List all servers' uses a specific verb ('list') and resource ('servers'), clearly distinguishing it from sibling tools like 'get_server' (specific server), 'create_server', etc. The purpose is immediately understandable.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives like 'coolify_get_server' or 'coolify_get_server_resources'. The description provides no context for selection.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/Ruashots/coolify-mcp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server