get_game_rules

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries full burden. It does not mention side effects, idempotency, data freshness, or that the call is read-only. While the tool likely has no side effects, the description omits behavioral traits that would help an agent.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single sentence that conveys the key information efficiently. The cryptic suffix '(17-0)' is somewhat extraneous but does not significantly harm conciseness.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given no output schema or annotations, the description is minimally adequate. It lists what data is returned but does not specify format or structure. For a parameterless tool, it is sufficient but not thorough.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

There are zero parameters, and schema description coverage is 100% (vacuously). The description does not need to add meaning beyond the schema, so a baseline of 4 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool returns 'verified game rules, roster constraints, and public entry points,' which gives a specific verb and resource. It distinguishes itself from the sibling 'get_official_links' by focusing on rules and constraints. However, the cryptic suffix '(17-0)' is unexplained and may cause confusion.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No explicit guidance on when to use this tool vs. the sibling 'get_official_links' or other alternatives. The description does not state prerequisites, exclusions, or recommended context for invocation.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.