Skip to main content
Glama
RinardNick

MCP Terminal Server

by RinardNick
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
JavaScript
Hybrid

Related Servers

Alternatives to MCP Terminal Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • cmd-line-mcp

      wwqdrh
      A
      license
      B
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      A secure Model Context Protocol server that allows AI assistants to execute terminal commands with controlled directory access and command permissions. It features a robust security architecture including whitelisting, session IDs, and categorized command levels to ensure safe system interaction.
      8
      MIT

    • MCP Shell Server

      mako10k
      A
      license
      B
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      A secure MCP server for shell operations, terminal management, and process control, enabling AI assistants to safely execute commands and manage interactive sessions.
      13
      153 npm
      6
      MIT

    • mcp-shell-server

      tumf
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      A secure shell command execution server implementing the Model Context Protocol (MCP). This server allows remote execution of whitelisted shell commands with support for stdin input.
      1
      194
      MIT

    • MCP Terminal

      sichang824
      A
      license
      C
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      A server that enables AI assistants to execute terminal commands and retrieve outputs via the Model Context Protocol (MCP).
      3
      27
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    B3.1/5.0

    Scored across 1 tool

    Disambiguation5/5

    With only one tool, there is no possibility of ambiguity or overlap between tools. The tool's purpose is clearly defined as running terminal commands with security controls, making it distinct by default.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    The single tool follows a clear verb_noun pattern (run_command), which is consistent and predictable. Since there are no other tools to compare against, it inherently maintains perfect naming consistency.

    Tool Count2/5

    A single tool for a terminal server is too few for the apparent scope, as terminal operations typically involve multiple actions (e.g., list files, navigate directories, monitor processes). This minimal set feels thin and incomplete for the domain.

    Completeness2/5

    The tool surface is severely incomplete for a terminal server domain. While run_command covers command execution, there are obvious gaps such as listing files, checking system status, or managing processes, which will likely cause agent failures in typical terminal workflows.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources