set_device_parameter

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Discloses that value is clamped to min/max and parameter can be index or name. However, no annotations exist, so description should also cover side effects or permissions; it does not, so transparency is adequate but not comprehensive.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Description is brief, well-structured with bullet-point parameters, and front-loads the core purpose. No redundant words.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Covers all four parameters, prerequisites, and value clamping. Does not explain return value, but output schema exists. Overall complete given complexity and available annotations.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

With 0% schema coverage, description fully compensates by explaining each parameter: track_index, device_index, parameter (int or string), value (number in its own units, example dB). Adds examples and usage details beyond schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Description clearly states the action 'Set a device parameter' with specific examples (e.g., a Utility's Gain, a Compressor's Threshold) and distinguishes it from sibling 'get_device_parameters' by focusing on writing vs reading.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Explicitly advises to call 'get_device_parameters first to see names/ranges', providing clear prerequisite guidance. No when-not-to-use or alternatives, but the instruction is strong.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.