get_browser_tree

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries the full burden. It only indicates that the tool retrieves a tree of categories, but it does not disclose behavioral traits such as whether it is read-only, any state dependencies, or error conditions. More context about the output structure would be beneficial.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is extremely concise, using just two sentences to state the purpose and list parameters. It is front-loaded with the key action and provides the parameter list in a clear format with no unnecessary words.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given that an output schema exists, the description does not need to explain return values. However, it could be improved by clarifying how this tool relates to ‘get_browser_items_at_path’ (e.g., tree vs. items at a path) to provide complete context for the agent.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema only specifies a string parameter with default 'all', with no enum values. The description adds substantial value by listing all allowed values ('all', 'instruments', 'sounds', 'drums', 'audio_effects', 'midi_effects'), which compensates for the 0% schema coverage.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool 'Get a hierarchical tree of browser categories from Ableton,' which is a specific verb+resource. However, it does not differentiate from the sibling tool 'get_browser_items_at_path', which might also deal with the browser hierarchy.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives like 'get_browser_items_at_path'. There is no mention of prerequisites, exclusions, or context that would help the agent choose this tool.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.