delete_clip

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description only states the basic action and that it empties the slot, but lacks details on whether deletion is irreversible, how it affects arrangement clips, or error behavior. With no annotations, more disclosure is needed.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is concise with a clear one-line purpose followed by parameter explanations. It is front-loaded and contains no fluff, though the parameter list could be integrated into a single sentence.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple deletion tool with an output schema, the description provides basic purpose and parameter meaning but lacks context about recovery, preconditions, or scope of effect. It is adequate but leaves gaps.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Given 0% schema description coverage, the description compensates by explaining both parameters as index of track and clip slot. However, it does not specify zero-based indexing or behavior for invalid indices, so it adds basic but incomplete meaning.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states the tool deletes a clip in a specified track/clip slot and empties the slot. It uses specific verbs and resources, clearly distinguishing from sibling tools like fire_clip, stop_clip, or clear_clip_notes.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives (e.g., remove notes, stop playback). It does not mention prerequisites like the slot being occupied or potential side effects.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.