Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to pango-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI coding agents and IDEs to lint, compile, syntax-check, and simulate Verilog/SystemVerilog designs through structured, token-efficient MCP tools with isolated containerized toolchains.
      4
      32 npm
      Apache 2.0
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables MCP-capable agents to execute boardless AMD Vivado Project Mode PL development flows through safe, policy-constrained tools while preserving diagnostic and reproducible project evidence.
      41
      3
      Apache 2.0
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      An MCP server for FPGA toolchain operations including linting, simulation, synthesis, place-and-route, bitstream programming, and IP core registry via GitHub.
      25
      5
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      A lean MCP server that lets AI agents drive Xilinx Vivado for synthesis, implementation, simulation, and diagnostics through 30 curated tools and raw Tcl execution.
      Apache 2.0
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      MCP server for deterministic Vivado FPGA automation including project scaffolding, simulation, synthesis, implementation, and gated bitstream generation.
      4
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Provides AI assistants with a complete FPGA toolchain for HDL linting, simulation, synthesis, and place-and-route across various hardware targets. It features a GitHub-backed IP core registry that enables users to search for and import MIT-licensed cores directly through their chat interface.
      15
      1
      MIT

    TDQS

    A3.6/5.0

    Scored across 45 tools

    Disambiguation2/5

    Many tools overlap in purpose or responsibility: there are three ILA capture paths (fpga_jtag_capture, fpga_ila_capture, fpga_ila_console), two scan tools with different stacks (fpga_pds_scan, fpga_jtag_scan), and multiple ways to build/compile (fpga_pds_run, fpga_pds_compile, fpga_pds_batch, fpga_ila_build). The descriptions are long and detailed, but an agent would struggle to confidently choose between them without deep context.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    The fpga_ prefix and snake_case verb_noun pattern are consistent (fpga_pds_run, fpga_flash_sram, fpga_ila_open), with occasional deviation (fpga_pds_create_blink_project, fpga_vault, fpga_env). Minor irregularity in domain grouping (some tools use fpga_pds_, some fpga_ila_, some fpga_jtag_, some no subdomain) but overall readable and predictable.

    Tool Count1/5

    45 tools is far beyond the well-scoped range, and many are thin wrappers (fpga_ila_adc_read, fpga_msim_compile, fpga_msim_do, fpga_pds_compile) around more general tools, resulting in a heavy, sprawling surface that will tax context and selection.

    Completeness5/5

    The covered domain—Pango FPGA build, JTAG scan/flash, ILA capture, simulation, and IP/documentation lookup—is remarkably complete, with multiple fallback paths and long-tail escape hatches (fpga_cdt, fpga_exe, fpga_msim_do). There are no obvious dead ends; if anything the surface is over-complete.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues