zotero-library-mcp

Get Collection Items

get_collection_items

Read-onlyIdempotent

Browse items in a specific Zotero collection with pagination. Set limit and start offset to retrieve one page at a time.

Instructions

Get items in a specific collection, one page at a time.

Args: collection_id: The collection key to browse limit: Maximum number of items to return per page (default 25, max 100) start: Offset of the first item; pass the value suggested by the previous call's footer to fetch the next page (default 0)

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema

Name	Required	Description	Default
`limit`	No
`start`	No
`library_id`	No
`library_type`	No
`collection_id`	Yes

Output Schema

TableJSON Schema

Name	Required	Description	Default
`result`	Yes

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

Changed2 schema fields changedv0.10.0Sep 14, 2026

addedInput schema / properties / library_id

Added value: +{
+  "anyOf": [
+    {
+      "type": "string"
+    },
+    {
+      "type": "null"
+    }
+  ],
+  "default": null,
+  "title": "Library Id"
+}

addedInput schema / properties / library_type

Added value: +{
+  "anyOf": [
+    {
+      "enum": [
+        "user",
+        "group"
+      ],
+      "type": "string"
+    },
+    {
+      "type": "null"
+    }
+  ],
+  "default": null,
+  "title": "Library Type"
+}

First observedv0.9.0Aug 12, 2026

TDQS

B3.4/5.0

Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnly, idempotent, non-destructive, closed-world semantics, so the safety profile is covered. The description adds non-obvious behavioral context beyond that: results come one page at a time, and the next page is driven by a value surfaced in the previous call's footer.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Front-loaded summary sentence followed by a compact Args block; no filler. The footer-pagination hint is a bit wordy but earns its place by describing a non-obvious workflow.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness3/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

An output schema exists, so return values need not be explained, and the pagination mechanics are covered. However, the two undocumented library-scoping parameters leave a gap an agent may need to fill to correctly target a collection.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

With 0% schema description coverage, the description must carry the full burden, and it documents only 3 of 5 params. It gives useful detail on collection_id, limit (default 25, max 100), and start (offset, default 0), but library_id and library_type are left entirely unexplained with no enum or type hints from the schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a specific verb and resource ('Get items in a specific collection') plus the pagination scope, so the core action is unambiguous. It does not name or contrast against siblings like get_unfiled_items, get_recent_items, or search_library, so an agent must infer which listing tool fits.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description explains the pagination loop but gives no when-to-use vs alternatives guidance. Nothing tells the agent why to pick this over get_unfiled_items or search_library when browsing items.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.