Delete Collection

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare destructiveHint=true and readOnlyHint=false, so the safety profile is covered. The description adds genuinely non-obvious context beyond that: deletion is permanent and, crucially, does not cascade to contained items, which the destructive hint alone cannot convey. It stops short of permissions or confirmation/irreversibility details.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Three short lines, front-loaded with the action and its most important consequence. The 'Args:' block adds little value but costs little space.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

An output schema exists, so return values need not be explained, and the key cascade behavior is disclosed. However, for a destructive, irreversible operation with two entirely undocumented optional scoping parameters, the definition is thinner than it should be.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0%, so the description must carry the burden, but it only restates collection_id ('The collection key to delete'). library_id and library_type — which determine which library the collection is deleted from — are undocumented in both the schema and the description, leaving a meaningful scoping gap.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a specific verb and resource ('Permanently delete a collection from your Zotero library'), which cleanly separates it from delete_item, delete_tags, and delete_note in the sibling set. The adverb 'Permanently' also distinguishes it from soft-delete siblings like trash_item.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No statement of when to use this versus alternatives such as remove_from_collection (which removes items but keeps the collection) or trash_item. The only guidance is a consequence note, which informs behavior rather than tool selection.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.