get_attendance_performance

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are present, so the description must fully disclose behavioral traits. The short phrase only indicates the concept of monthly attendance performance without mentioning read-only nature, authentication requirements, or potential side effects. Agents are left uninformed about safe usage.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is extremely concise (3 words), but lacks any structural elements like front-loaded key points. While brevity is positive, it sacrifices informativeness. A slightly longer description with explicit action and scope would improve clarity without losing conciseness.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given no output schema and no annotations, the description is too sparse to fully inform an agent. It does not explain what 'performance' means, what the response looks like, or how it differs from other attendance tools. Completeness is insufficient for reliable tool selection.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema has 100% description coverage for both month and year parameters. The tool description does not add additional meaning beyond what the schema already provides. Per the scoring rule, baseline is 3 when coverage is high and description adds no extra value.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description 'Performa kehadiran bulanan' translates to 'Monthly attendance performance', clearly indicating the tool retrieves monthly performance data. It distinguishes from siblings like get_attendance_detail (likely per-day) and get_attendance_history (historical overview). However, it lacks an explicit verb like 'get' or 'list', so it slightly reduces clarity.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives such as get_attendance_detail or get_attendance_history. The description only implies usage through the phrase 'bulanan' (monthly), but does not explicitly state when it should be preferred.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.