get_attendance_detail

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries the burden. It states the tool returns details of one record, which suggests a read operation. However, it does not disclose any behavioral traits such as authentication requirements, rate limits, or error conditions. The description is minimal but not misleading.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is very short (one phrase) and gets to the point. While it is concise, it lacks structural elements like separate sentences for context or usage. It is efficient but could be slightly more organized.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool has a single required parameter and no output schema, the description is mostly complete for a simple retrieval tool. However, it does not mention what fields are included in the detail response, which would be helpful for an agent.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

With 100% schema description coverage, the baseline is 3. The description does not add semantic value beyond what the schema already provides for the 'id' parameter (UUID of the record). It merely restates the parameter's purpose.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description explicitly states it retrieves details of a single attendance record by UUID. It uses a specific verb ('Detail' in Indonesian, meaning 'get details') and resource ('attendance record'), clearly distinguishing it from sibling tools like get_attendance_history or get_today_attendance_status.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies the tool is for fetching a specific attendance record, but it provides no guidance on when to use it versus alternatives like get_attendance_history (for multiple records) or get_today_attendance_status. No explicit context or exclusions are given.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.