Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to SAGE

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Local MCP server that lets your AI coding agent query its own cross-tool project history - file/command freshness, past test failures, cost & token spend, cache status, and session handoff - over stdio, 100% local, no telemetry.
      45
      -
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Local-first MCP server that gives any AI coding agent per-project memory, workflow intelligence, and always-on, lossless token & context optimization.
      37
      12 npm
      5
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      An agent-native shell as an MCP server, designed for LLM agents (like Claude Code) to execute commands with structured output, lazy detail retrieval, and effect tracking, minimizing token usage.
      9
      6 npm
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      Not graded
      maintenance
      A secure and pluggable MCP server to run terminal commands on your local machine or cloud server — remotely, safely, and with LLMs or agentic clients.
      -

    TDQS

    A4/5.0

    Scored across 11 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool targets a distinct concern: reading/searching files, running commands, running workflows, recovering history, and explaining failures. Potential overlaps such as sage_call vs sage_agentic_run vs sage_run_workflow or sage_explain_error vs sage_suggest_fix are clearly separated by purpose and behavior.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    All tools share the sage_ prefix and lowercase snake_case style, and most follow a verb_noun pattern like sage_explain_error and sage_run_workflow. A few names such as sage_grep, sage_call, sage_tree, and sage_agentic_run break the pattern, but the overall convention is still predictable.

    Tool Count5/5

    Eleven tools is a well-scoped size for a developer command execution and context management server. Each tool addresses a distinct workflow step without obvious redundancy or bloat.

    Completeness4/5

    The set covers command execution, workflow runs, failure explanation, fix suggestions, history lookup, raw output recovery, and compressed file/search navigation. A minor gap is the lack of a tool to enumerate available project workflows, but agents can work around this by attempting a workflow or checking project files.

    Maintenance

    ActivityActive
    ResponsivenessNo issues