Skip to main content
Glama
PsYcGoD

SAGE

by PsYcGoD
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to SAGE

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • SuperBased Observer

      superbasedapp
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Local MCP server that lets your AI coding agent query its own cross-tool project history - file/command freshness, past test failures, cost & token spend, cache status, and session handoff - over stdio, 100% local, no telemetry.
      48
      -

    • knitbrain

      PDgit12
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Local-first MCP server that gives any AI coding agent per-project memory, workflow intelligence, and always-on, lossless token & context optimization.
      37
      13 npm
      6
      MIT

    • veil-mcp

      vkmtx
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      An agent-native shell as an MCP server, designed for LLM agents (like Claude Code) to execute commands with structured output, lazy detail retrieval, and effect tracking, minimizing token usage.
      9
      9 npm
      MIT

    • terminal-mcp

      ParthKapoor-dev
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      Not graded
      maintenance
      A secure and pluggable MCP server to run terminal commands on your local machine or cloud server — remotely, safely, and with LLMs or agentic clients.
      -
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A3.9/5.0

    Scored across 16 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Most tools target distinct actions, but the failure-handling cluster (sage_explain_error, sage_suggest_fix, sage_agentic_fix) and the command-execution pair (sage_call vs sage_agentic_run) overlap enough that an agent could hesitate. Descriptions do a good job distinguishing them (single fix vs list vs explanation; recovery loop vs plain run), which keeps this above the mid range.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    Every tool uses the sage_ prefix with snake_case, following a predictable verb_noun or verb form (write_file, read_file, run_workflow, spawn_agent, explain_error). The few bare names (call, grep, glob, tree) are conventional and still fit the pattern.

    Tool Count4/5

    16 tools sits just above the ideal 3-15 band, but the domain is genuinely broad (file I/O, search, command execution, agentic recovery, workflows, history), so each tool earns roughly its place. Slightly over-scoped rather than bloated.

    Completeness4/5

    Covers read/write/edit, search (grep/glob/tree), command execution, workflows, history, error diagnosis, fix suggestion, and agent spawning — a near-complete lifecycle. A file delete/remove operation is the most visible gap, but agents can work around it.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources