ptero_app_get_servers_external_external_id

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations provided, and the description does not disclose behavioral traits such as side effects, authentication requirements, rate limits, or output behavior. While GET implies idempotent read, this is not explicitly stated.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is extremely concise (single line), but this is due to under-specification rather than efficient structure. It lacks any explanatory sentences or formatting to aid comprehension.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the complexity (3 parameters, no schema coverage, no output schema, no annotations), the description is severely incomplete. It does not enable an AI agent to select or invoke this tool with confidence.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Zero schema coverage. Description adds no meaning to parameters: external_id is not explained, query and body are entirely undocumented. Agent cannot determine what values to provide or their effects.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Description merely restates the HTTP method and endpoint path, essentially repeating the tool name without explaining what the tool does in plain language. It fails to distinguish from sibling tool 'ptero_app_get_servers_server' which also retrieves a server.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No usage guidelines provided. Does not specify when to use this tool over alternatives like ptero_app_get_servers_server (by internal ID) or ptero_app_get_servers (list all). Agent must infer context from name alone.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.