ptero_app_get_nests_nest_eggs

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description identifies the operation as a GET request, which implies read-only and non-destructive behavior. However, with no annotations provided, this minimal disclosure does not cover authentication needs, error handling, or rate limits, leaving significant behavioral gaps.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is extremely concise (one line) but under-specified; it lacks structure such as a plain-language summary or parameter details. The conciseness does not serve the agent's needs, as critical information is missing.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the presence of three parameters (one required), no output schema, and no annotations, the description is severely incomplete. The agent cannot infer return format, parameter meaning, or usage constraints from this description alone.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0%, and the description adds zero information about the three parameters (nest, query, body). It does not clarify that 'nest' is a required identifier or explain the purpose of query and body in a GET request.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description merely repeats the HTTP method and endpoint path ('GET /api/application/nests/{nest}/eggs'), providing minimal purpose. It implies a list operation but does not explain what 'eggs' are in context or how this differs from related tools like ptero_app_get_nests_nest_eggs_egg.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is given on when to use this tool versus alternatives such as ptero_app_get_nests_nest or ptero_app_get_nests_nest_eggs_egg. The description lacks any contextual cues for selection.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.