ae_animate_transform

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries the full burden. It explains default values for `from` and mentions easing, but does not disclose whether existing keyframes are overwritten, error behavior, or other side effects. The added context is useful but incomplete.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is two sentences, front-loading the purpose and following with critical default behavior. Every sentence adds value with no redundancy.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

With 9 parameters, no output schema, and no annotations, the description covers the core functionality but omits details about timing parameters and the full set of easing options. It is adequate but leaves room for more comprehensive guidance.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is only 33%. The description adds meaning by detailing default `from` values per property and listing the property enum, but does not explain `comp`, `layer`, `startTime`, `endTime`, `easing` details, or `influence` beyond schema. It compensates partially but insufficiently for low coverage.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states that the tool keyframes a transform property (position, scale, rotation, opacity) from one value to another, and explicitly labels it as the general-purpose 'move this from A to B smoothly' tool, distinguishing it from sibling animation tools.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description sets context by calling it 'general-purpose' for smooth transitions, but does not explicitly state when to avoid using it or name specific alternatives. However, the sibling list provides implicit differentiation.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.