pressable_get_phpmyadmin_url

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations provided, the description carries the full burden of behavioral disclosure. It mentions 'time-limited' (indicating the URL expires), but does not disclose other important aspects such as authentication requirements, side effects, whether the operation is read-only, or what happens if the site ID is invalid. This is minimal behavioral context.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, concise sentence with no unnecessary words. It is front-loaded and clearly conveys the core function without any padding.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple tool with one parameter and no output schema, the description provides the core purpose but leaves gaps. It does not describe the return format (e.g., that the response contains the URL), how long the URL remains valid, or any additional context about the site requirement. Given the minimal complexity, the description is adequate but not fully complete.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The schema has one required 'id' parameter with no description, and schema description coverage is 0%. The description does not explicitly explain what 'id' represents, though the phrase 'for a site' hints that it is a site ID. This is insufficient compensation for the complete lack of schema-level parameter documentation.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the action ('Get') and the resource ('a time-limited phpMyAdmin URL for a site'), making the tool's purpose immediately obvious. It uniquely distinguishes this tool from all sibling tools, since no other sibling provides a phpMyAdmin URL.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies the tool is used to obtain a phpMyAdmin URL, but it provides no explicit guidance on when to use it versus alternatives, nor any exclusions or prerequisites. Since the purpose is so specific, the usage context is implied, but not clearly articulated.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.