pressable_add_site_domain

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations provided, the description carries full responsibility for behavioral disclosure. It only says 'Add a domain to a site' without indicating side effects, reversibility, or any potential destructive impact. For a mutation tool, this lack of transparency is a significant gap.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, concise sentence with zero wasted words. It is front-loaded with the action and object, making it immediately understandable.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The tool is simple with two parameters, but the description omits important contextual details such as return value, error conditions, or any prerequisites (e.g., domain ownership verification). Since there is no output schema, the description should have explained expected outcomes. Still, the basic purpose is clear, making it minimally viable.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema indicates two required string parameters, 'id' and 'domain', but the description does not elaborate on their semantics. 'id' is ambiguous; while the description implies it's the site identifier, it does not explicitly say so. The schema coverage is 0%, so the description should compensate, but it does not.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the action ('Add') and the object ('a domain to a site'). It effectively distinguishes this from sibling tools like 'pressable_list_site_domains' by indicating a mutation operation. However, it lacks any additional context about the domain being added, such as verification or ownership requirements.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No usage guidance is provided. The description does not mention when to use this tool versus alternatives, nor any prerequisites or constraints. It simply states the action without context.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.