pressable_get_account_activity_log_actions

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries the full burden for behavioral disclosure. The description implies a read-only operation via 'Get a list', but it does not explicitly state that it is safe, nor does it disclose any response format, pagination, or authentication requirements. For a simple read-only list tool, this is acceptable but still leaves some gaps, so a score of 3 is appropriate.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, clear sentence that gets straight to the point. It contains no extraneous words and is perfectly sized for its purpose.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a parameterless read-only list tool with no output schema, the description is largely complete: it states what is returned (a list of all available activity log actions). It could potentially specify whether these are identifiers or names and how they might be used, but that is a minor gap. The overall context is clear.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The tool has zero parameters, so per the rubric a baseline of 4 is assigned. The description does not need to explain parameters, as there are none.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description uses a specific verb 'Get a list' and a clear resource 'activity log actions for the account', which precisely defines what the tool does. It also distinguishes itself from sibling tools like pressable_get_account_activity_logs (which retrieves the logs themselves, not the list of available action types).

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description gives clear context: it is used to retrieve all available activity log actions for the account. It does not explicitly state when not to use it or mention alternatives, but the purpose is unambiguous given the tool name and the sibling set. This is clear context without exclusions, so it earns a 4.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.