Отправить объявления на модерацию

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnlyHint=false, openWorldHint=true, and idempotentHint=true, so the safety/mutation profile is covered structurally. The description adds nothing on top: it does not say whether already-moderated ads are re-submitted, what status results, whether there is a review delay, or any account-level constraints.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

A single short sentence with no filler, which is structurally clean, but it is under-specified rather than concise — every word restates what the name already conveys.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a write/submission tool with no output schema, the description should at minimum explain what happens after submission and any constraints (e.g., the 1–10000 ad_ids limit is only in the schema). As written, an agent has no behavioral context about the moderation workflow.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Only one parameter (ad_ids), and schema description coverage is 100% with item-level and array-level descriptions plus min/maxItems constraints. The description adds no format or batching detail beyond the schema, so the baseline 3 applies.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description ('Send selected ads for moderation') is essentially a verbatim translation of the title ('Отправить объявления на модерацию'), adding no information beyond the name/title. It states a verb+resource, but does nothing to distinguish this tool from siblings like update_text_ad or manage_ads, and never explains what 'moderation' entails.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

There is no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives such as update_text_ad or manage_ads, no prerequisites, and no mention of what state the ads must be in first. Usage must be entirely inferred from the name.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.