PubMed MCP Server
Related Servers
Alternatives to PubMed MCP Server
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceEnables LLM agents to search biomedical literature, retrieve article details, find related papers, manage caching, and download open-access full texts through MCP with structured, agent-friendly responses.5Apache 2.0
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceEnables AI agents to search and read PubMed academic literature directly, without requiring an NCBI API key.21MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceEnables PubMed literature search, metadata retrieval, BibTeX export, and evidence table generation for biomedical research agents.2MIT
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceEnables agents to search a public PubMed-derived corpus by natural language or identifiers and to retrieve publication details while traversing bounded citation and semantic literature graphs.7Apache 2.0
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceAn MCP server that provides direct access to PubMed and PubMed Central via the NCBI E-utilities API. It enables AI models to search biomedical literature, retrieve detailed article metadata, and download open-access full texts.5MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables AI agents to retrieve and search open-access life-sciences and biomedical journal articles from eLife via MCP.3 npmMIT
TDQS
Scored across 5 tools
Each tool has a clear primary purpose: search, fetch full records, extract specific fields, find related articles, and manage cache. However, pubmed_get_details and pubmed_extract_info could be confused by an agent, as both retrieve article information, though the descriptions differentiate full records from targeted extraction.
All tool names follow a consistent pattern: 'pubmed_' prefix followed by a verb or verb_noun phrase (search, get_details, extract_info, find_related, manage_cache). The naming is uniform, snake_case, and clearly indicates the operation performed.
Five tools is a well-scoped set for a PubMed MCP server, covering core literature search and retrieval without redundancy. The count feels appropriately moderate, not overwhelming or thin.
The toolset covers the full typical workflow: search for articles, retrieve full details, extract specific sections, discover related articles, and manage cache for efficiency. No obvious critical gaps exist for a literature search domain.