get_status_page_post

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnlyHint=true, idempotentHint=true, and destructiveHint=false, indicating a safe read. The description merely restates the return type (StatusPagePost details) without adding behavioral traits like authentication needs, rate limits, or response format details beyond what the output schema provides.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is concise and well-structured with an Args block. However, it could be slightly more streamlined by removing the boilerplate 'Returns' line since the output schema exists. Still, every sentence provides value.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the presence of an output schema and clear parameter descriptions, the tool is functionally complete. However, with over 30 sibling tools, additional context about when to use this retrieval versus other get functions would enhance completeness.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The description adds comprehensive parameter explanations for all three parameters, despite the schema having 0% coverage. It clarifies the meaning of status_page_id, post_id, and query_model, including example usage for query_model ('e.g., include related resources'). This fully compensates for the missing schema descriptions.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description explicitly states 'Get a Post for a Status Page by Status Page ID and Post ID,' using a specific verb and resource. It distinguishes itself from sibling tools like list_status_page_post_updates and list_status_page_impacts by focusing on a single post retrieval.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives. The description does not provide context for when to choose get_status_page_post over other get tools (e.g., get_incident, get_service) or list tools. No exclusions or prerequisites are mentioned.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.