Remove thread member

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations declare readOnlyHint=false and destructiveHint=false, and the description adds the requirement of 'Manage Threads' permission, which is useful context. However, it does not disclose whether the removal is reversible or any side effects, so transparency is adequate but not rich.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single sentence that is succinct and to the point, with no unnecessary words. It front-loades the core action and immediately follows with the required permission.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple mutation tool with no output schema and well-documented parameters, the description covers the essential information (action, resource, permission). It is slightly lacking in behavioral details but sufficient given the tool's simplicity.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema has 100% description coverage for all 3 parameters (thread, guild, member). The tool description does not add any additional meaning or context beyond what is already provided in the schema, so it meets the baseline for parameter semantics.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the action (Remove a member) and the resource (a thread). It distinguishes from sibling tools like add_thread_member and kick_member by specifying the exact operation on a thread.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description mentions 'Needs Manage Threads' which indicates a permission requirement but does not provide explicit guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives like kick_member or remove_role. Usage context is implied but incomplete.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.