Create server template

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already indicate this is a write operation (readOnlyHint false) and non-destructive (destructiveHint false). The description adds a meaningful behavioral detail beyond these annotations: 'One template per server', which signals a potential failure or constraint if a template already exists. It also uses 'Snapshot' to suggest it captures the current state without altering the server. However, it does not specify what happens when the constraint is violated (e.g., error, overwrite) or mention any side effects on existing templates.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is two sentences long and front-loads the primary action ('Snapshot this server's structure'.) Every word contributes meaning: it states the purpose, the target resource, the output, and a key constraint. There is no redundancy or filler. This is a model of conciseness for a clear, single-purpose tool.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool's moderate complexity (3 params, no output schema, minimal annotations), the description covers the core action and an important constraint. It is reasonably complete for an agent to understand what the tool does. However, it leaves out details about the return format (e.g., does it return the template code?) and error behavior when the one-template-per-server limit is reached. These would enhance completeness but are not strictly required for basic invocation.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is low (only 33%, with 'guild' described but 'name' and 'description' not explained). The tool description does not compensate for this gap; it does not describe the purpose or behavior of any parameters. The description 'this server's structure' implicitly relates to the 'guild' parameter, but it provides no guidance on how 'name' or 'description' are used. The agent would have to infer the semantics from context, which is insufficient for a 3-parameter tool with one required param.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description uses a specific verb ('Snapshot') and clearly identifies the resource ('this server's structure') and the outcome (a Discord template others can use). It distinguishes well from sibling template tools like list_server_templates, sync_server_template, and delete_server_template by focusing on creation. The additional constraint 'One template per server' further clarifies scope.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies usage context ('when you want to snapshot the server structure') and states the one-template-per-server constraint, but it does not explicitly guide when to use this tool versus alternatives (e.g., sync_server_template for updating an existing template) or mention scenarios where one should avoid using it. No explicit exclusions are provided, leaving the usage guidance somewhat implicit.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.