Clone channel

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description discloses that the tool copies settings and permission overwrites and places the new channel in the same category, which adds detail beyond the annotations. It does not contradict annotations (readOnlyHint=false, destructiveHint=false). However, it does not mention whether the original channel is modified or if messages are copied, though 'copy' implies non-destructive.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

A single sentence that is front-loaded with the action and resource, with no filler words.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The description is adequate for a simple clone operation with annotations present. It specifies the input, output (new channel), and constraint (same category). It does not cover edge cases or return values, but given the schema and annotations, the description is sufficiently complete.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

All three parameters are fully described in the schema (100% coverage), so the description does not need to add parameter details. It adds marginal context by mentioning 'settings and permission overwrites' which maps to the channel parameter, but the schema already handles it.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description uses the specific verb 'Copy' and identifies the resource ('a channel's settings and permission overwrites') and the outcome ('into a new channel in the same category'). It clearly differentiates from sibling tools like create_channel and update_channel.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides no explicit when-to-use guidance or comparison with alternatives like create_channel or clone_role. The usage context is implied by the purpose, but no exclusions or prerequisites are stated.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.