sell_option_limit

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, and the description lacks behavioral details such as order execution behavior, fees, margin requirements, or potential order rejection. The description only states the action and parameters, providing minimal transparency beyond what is obvious from the name.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is concise (two sentences plus parameter list) but lacks structure (e.g., no separate Usage or Returns sections). It is minimally acceptable but could be better organized.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool's simplicity (3 required params, no nested objects, output schema exists), the description is somewhat adequate. However, it omits important context like order life cycle, confirmation, or error scenarios. The presence of an output schema partially compensates for missing return value explanation.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The description adds limited value beyond the input schema: it explains 'limit_price' as 'the minimum price per contract', which is helpful. However, 'instrument_id' and 'quantity' are not elaborated beyond their names. Since schema coverage is 0%, the description partially compensates but does not fully clarify all parameters.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states that the tool places a limit sell order for an option, specifying the verb 'places' and resource 'limit sell order for option'. This distinguishes it from sibling tools like buy_option_limit (buy) and sell_stock_limit (stock).

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives (e.g., market orders, other option strategies). No prerequisites or context are given, leaving the agent to infer usage from the tool name alone.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.