schwab_order_sell_option_limit

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided. The description only states the action of placing an order without disclosing behavioral traits like order lifecycle, margin requirements, or what happens on success/failure. For a tool with no annotations, more detail is needed.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is concise with a one-line summary followed by a structured Args list. Every sentence adds value, and the information is front-loaded.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the complexity of an option limit order and the existence of an output schema, the description covers parameter details but lacks behavioral context (e.g., order execution model, margin checks). It is adequate but not comprehensive.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema has 0% description coverage. The description's Args section fully compensates by explaining each parameter: account_hash source, OCC symbol format with example, quantity as contracts, and price as string with example. This adds significant meaning beyond schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states 'Place a limit sell-to-close order for an option contract.' This specifies the verb (place), order type (limit sell-to-close), and asset (option contract), distinguishing it from siblings like buy_option_limit or sell_stock_limit.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description does not explicitly state when to use this tool versus alternatives (e.g., buy_option_limit for opening). It implies the sell-to-close context from the name but lacks explicit guidance on prerequisites or alternatives, making it minimally adequate.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.