Get Kimai Server Info

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description confirms the tool is read-only, matching annotations. It adds specific details about which endpoints are read (status, version, plugins, timesheet config). This provides useful context beyond annotations.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two concise sentences with no unnecessary words. Action verb 'Read' is front-loaded, and all information is relevant and well-structured.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The description lists what endpoints are read but does not describe the return structure or format. Without an output schema, more detail on what the response contains would improve completeness.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, and the description adds no extra meaning to the parameter. The parameter's purpose is already described in the schema, so the description meets the baseline without adding value.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool reads Kimai server info including API status, version, plugins, and timesheet configuration. This distinguishes it from sibling tools that focus on specific resources like users, timesheets, or customers.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implicitly indicates when to use this tool (to get server info), but lacks explicit guidance on when not to use it or alternatives. Given the tool's distinct focus, the context is sufficient.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.