getAppointmentType

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description must carry the full burden. It correctly indicates a get (read) operation with no side effects, but it does not disclose return format, error behavior, or permissions. The minimal behavior is transparent, but additional context is lacking.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, concise sentence of six words. Every word contributes to the meaning, with no unnecessary information. Excellent structure and length.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple getter with one required parameter and no output schema, the description is adequate. It clarifies the resource and the method of lookup. It could mention that the full appointment type object is returned, but this is easily inferred from the tool name and 'get' semantics. Given the simplicity, this is reasonably complete.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100% with the parameter described as 'Type ID'. The description mentions 'by ID', which aligns with the schema but does not add additional meaning beyond what the schema already provides. This meets the baseline for high coverage.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the verb ('get'), resource ('appointment type'), and scope ('by ID'). It effectively distinguishes itself from sibling tools like listAppointmentTypes, createAppointmentType, and updateAppointmentType, which have different actions.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies usage when you have a specific ID, but it does not explicitly mention when to use it versus alternatives, nor does it provide exclusions or references to other tools. The context is clear from the phrase 'by ID', but the guidance is only implicit.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.