Skip to main content
Glama
Mnehmos

arXiv MCP Server

search_by_category

Retrieve academic papers from arXiv by specifying a category, sorting options, and pagination parameters. Supports filtering by relevance, submission, or update date.

Instructions

Search for papers in a specific arXiv category

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
categoryYesarXiv category (e.g., cs.AI, physics.optics)
max_resultsNoMaximum number of results to return (max 2000)
sort_byNoSort by: relevance, lastUpdatedDate, submittedDate
sort_orderNoSort order: ascending or descending
startNoStarting index for pagination (0-based)

Implementation Reference

  • The main handler function that implements the search_by_category tool logic. It constructs arXiv API search parameters using the provided category and optional pagination/sorting options, queries the arXiv API, processes the response, and returns the results.
    private async searchByCategory(args: SearchByCategoryArgs) {
      const searchParams: SearchParams = {
        search_query: `cat:${args.category}`,
      };
      
      // Add pagination
      if (args.start !== undefined) {
        searchParams.start = args.start;
      }
      
      if (args.max_results !== undefined) {
        searchParams.max_results = Math.min(args.max_results, 2000); // API limit
      } else {
        searchParams.max_results = 10; // Default
      }
      
      // Add sorting
      if (args.sort_by) {
        searchParams.sortBy = args.sort_by;
      }
      
      if (args.sort_order) {
        searchParams.sortOrder = args.sort_order;
      }
      
      const response = await this.queryArxiv(searchParams);
      return {
        content: [
          {
            type: 'text',
            text: JSON.stringify(response, null, 2),
          },
        ],
      };
    }
  • TypeScript interface defining the input arguments for the searchByCategory handler.
    interface SearchByCategoryArgs {
      category: string;
      start?: number;
      max_results?: number;
      sort_by?: string;
      sort_order?: string;
    }
  • src/index.ts:170-200 (registration)
    MCP tool registration in the ListTools response, including name, description, and JSON input schema.
      name: 'search_by_category',
      description: 'Search for papers in a specific arXiv category',
      inputSchema: {
        type: 'object',
        properties: {
          category: {
            type: 'string',
            description: 'arXiv category (e.g., cs.AI, physics.optics)',
          },
          start: {
            type: 'number',
            description: 'Starting index for pagination (0-based)',
          },
          max_results: {
            type: 'number',
            description: 'Maximum number of results to return (max 2000)',
          },
          sort_by: {
            type: 'string',
            description: 'Sort by: relevance, lastUpdatedDate, submittedDate',
            enum: ['relevance', 'lastUpdatedDate', 'submittedDate'],
          },
          sort_order: {
            type: 'string',
            description: 'Sort order: ascending or descending',
            enum: ['ascending', 'descending'],
          },
        },
        required: ['category'],
      },
    },
  • src/index.ts:231-238 (registration)
    Dispatcher case in CallToolRequest handler that validates input and invokes the searchByCategory method.
    case 'search_by_category':
      if (!request.params.arguments || typeof request.params.arguments.category !== 'string') {
        throw new McpError(
          ErrorCode.InvalidParams,
          'Missing or invalid category parameter'
        );
      }
      return await this.searchByCategory(request.params.arguments as unknown as SearchByCategoryArgs);
Behavior2/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations provided, the description carries full burden for behavioral disclosure. It mentions searching but doesn't describe what the search returns (e.g., paper metadata, abstracts), whether it's paginated (implied by 'start' parameter but not explained), rate limits, or authentication requirements. This is inadequate for a search tool with multiple parameters.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, efficient sentence that states the core function without unnecessary words. It's appropriately sized for a search tool and front-loads the essential information.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness2/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a search tool with 5 parameters, no annotations, and no output schema, the description is insufficient. It doesn't explain what the search returns, how results are structured, or provide context about arXiv categories. The agent would need to rely heavily on the input schema alone.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, so the schema already documents all 5 parameters thoroughly. The description adds no additional parameter information beyond what's in the schema (e.g., it doesn't explain category hierarchy or result format). Baseline 3 is appropriate when the schema does the heavy lifting.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the verb ('Search for') and resource ('papers in a specific arXiv category'), making the purpose immediately understandable. However, it doesn't distinguish this tool from its sibling 'search_papers', which appears to be a similar search function but without the category specificity mentioned.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives like 'search_papers' or 'get_paper'. It doesn't mention prerequisites, constraints, or typical use cases beyond the basic function, leaving the agent to infer usage from the tool name alone.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Related Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/Mnehmos/arxiv-mcp-server'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server