arXiv MCP Server
Related Servers
Alternatives to arXiv MCP Server
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseBqualityDmaintenanceEnables AI assistants to search and access arXiv research papers through a simple Message Control Protocol interface, allowing for paper search, download, listing, and reading capabilities.47Apache 2.0
- AlicenseBqualityDmaintenanceEnables AI assistants to search and access arXiv papers through a Model Context Protocol interface, allowing for paper search, download, listing, and reading functionality.42Apache 2.0
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceThe ArXiv MCP Server bridges the gap between AI models and academic research by providing a sophisticated interface to arXiv's extensive research repository. This server enables AI assistants to perform precise paper searches and access full paper content, enhancing their ability to engage with scientific literature.1916,178 PyPI3,175Apache 2.0
- AlicenseBqualityBmaintenanceAn MCP server for searching and downloading academic papers from multiple sources including arXiv, PubMed, bioRxiv, and Sci-Hub, designed for seamless integration with large language models like Claude Desktop.572,149 PyPI2,699MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables AI-powered academic paper discovery, search, and analysis from arXiv with advanced features like semantic search, citation network analysis, and multi-format exports (BibTeX, RIS, JSON, CSV). Provides intelligent research assistance through specialized AI prompts for summarization, trend tracking, and literature review automation.17MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceA bridge between AI assistants and ArXiv's research repository that enables searching, downloading, and reading academic papers through the Message Control Protocol.1MIT
TDQS
Scored across 4 tools
The tools are mostly distinct, with clear separation between getting paper details, extracting content, and two search methods. However, the two search tools (search_by_category and search_papers) could potentially cause some confusion as both involve searching, though their specific purposes (category-based vs. general criteria) are clarified in descriptions.
All tool names follow a consistent verb_noun pattern with clear, descriptive naming. Each name starts with an action verb (get, search) followed by a specific noun or phrase, maintaining uniformity throughout the set.
With 4 tools, the count is reasonable for an arXiv server, covering core operations like retrieval and search. It might be slightly lean, as additional tools for advanced filtering or metadata could enhance coverage, but it's well-scoped for basic functionality.
The tool set covers essential arXiv operations: retrieving paper details and content, and searching by category or criteria. Minor gaps exist, such as no tools for listing categories, handling paper versions, or user-specific features like favorites, but core workflows are adequately supported.